Alexis Lorenze, 23, continues to fight for her life. How did she turn purple? Alix joins Hall of Famers turned Medical Freedom Duo, John Stockton and Ken Ruettgers, for her third appearance on their Voices for Medical Freedom Show. They take an in-depth look at what may have happened to Lexi last week. We hope and pray for Lexi’s rapid and full recovery from this nightmare.
Alix describes, for the first time, the solution to preventing most injuries like the one Lexi is suffering. It’s codified into federal law, but no one talks about it, and our government has never done it!
“A Must-See!” said John and Ken. “Watch this show and come to your own conclusion,” said John.
It all started with Lexi entered UC Irvine to get a monoclonal antibody treatment for her rare blood disorder, PNH. Her physician said she would need three vaccines before she could get this treatment. Lexi agreed, very reluctantly, as she reportedly had a vaccine reaction when she was a little girl, and had not received any vaccines since that time, including COVID shots.
Only ten minutes after those vaccines, Lexi went temporarily blind in one eye, then in the other. She began to swell and vomit. What happened next was even more unthinkable than going temporarily blind. She began to break out in large purple spots all over her skin, creating the appearance of a dark purple cap on her head. It’s still unclear if the extensive purple patches are an exacerbation of her autoimmune blood disorder, PNH, or idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP,) a blood clotting disorder caused by low platelets. It could be both conditions.
We do know one thing. Vaccines can cause autoimmunity. The three vaccines her medical records now indicate she had — which differ from the vaccines she originally reported she had — were two versions of a meningitis vaccine and a vaccine for Hib. All three of those vaccines are associated with causing rare cases of ITP.
As of today, Lexi is still fighting for her life. Her skin is oozing and the lesions are so profuse, she was transferred to a burn unit so she could get special care for her skin. She also got a buzz cut so medical teams can access her scalp for treatment.
John, Ken and Alix dig into what could have caused Lexi’s huge health disaster, by taking a deep look at vaccines, and what we know about vaccine injury.
They conclude by sharing the solution to vaccine injury – Safer Vaccination Guidelines – which became law when President Reagan signed the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Alix was shocked to discover the document charged the Institute of Medicine to do the research leading to the Guidelines.
Unlike today’s draconian one-size-fits-all vaccination schedules, the Guidelines were to state which groups could be more adversely affected by vaccine side effects, and recommend skipping or delaying certain vaccinations. It even states “If the Institute of Medicine is unwilling to conduct such study under such an arrangement, the Secretary shall enter into a similar arrangement with other appropriate nonprofit private groups or associations.” The law even states the Secretary will pay the costs of the research leading to these Guidelines.
We think this will become a reality with the new Administration if RFK Jr., whom Alix has made aware of the legal requirement for these Guidelines, is placed in charge of one of our three-letter health agencies.












What did Alix call herself at the end of this video? She is ok with vaccines injuring people (because they all do), just allow them to injure them more slowly and wants to be put on the vaccine board with Robert Kennedy Jr who doesn’t give a shit about kids having their bodies blown apart in Gaza? you’re kidding? What a fake person! Never again will I donate to this.
Dear Lorraine,
Thank you for commenting on what I said in this video! Taking Kennedy out of the discussion, what I said was that a government-mandated solution to vaccine safety already exists in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. That Act called for the IOM to create guidelines for safer vaccination, triaging vaccines according to who could be injured by them, and recommending delaying or even skipping vaccines. The Act also said that if the IOM refuses to do such a study (which is really odd language to find in public legal code….a public agency mandated to do something could refuse!?), that an non-profit group should do this work at the expense of “the Secretary.” I assume that means Secretary of HHS.
I firmly believe in the adage that if you’re two steps ahead of the crowd, you’re considered crazy, but if you’re one step ahead, you’re considered a genius. That also applies to negotiations in a major way. If you are two steps ahead – wanting all vaccines off the market – you can’t even get a seat at the negotiating table since they think you are crazy. You have to meet your political opponent where he/she already is. Based on all the vax unvax studies our own government refuses to do, in my Utopian Society I DO want all vaccines off the market, and feel we have the proof to make it so. Obviously that is what I presented in this presentation, going even farther than vax-unvax, and explaining the biological mechanism by which vaccines do harm and showed more than one proof that vaccines are responsible for most of the chronic illness in the U.S., adding up to around 60% with chronic illness. The only way to make progress is to collaborate with the pro-vaccine side which obviously runs the show.
By getting behind the government-mandated guidelines project, we can restore vaccine choice, but also when the public knows the real risks, it’s over. No one will want vaccines. So at that point, leaving the “safer” vaccines on the market for anyone who wants them, the entire vaccine ruse will fold as we would finally have a perfect information society. That’s what I mean by not caring if vaccines stay on the market. If the IOM or a non profit does the studies and comes up with the guidelines to safer vaccination, the vaccines can stay on the market if they are proven safe. Any vaccines still left on the market can be used by people who refuse to read the data. Caveat emptor. I’m a Libertarian.
I have also studied game theory — think about if vaccines were banned! There would be a huge movement to get them back on the market. The dominant solution is to leave vaccines that are *relatively* safe on the market for those who rely on “common knowledge” (aka Old Wive’s Tale) that vaccines are safe and effective. They, like the Church during Galileo’s time, will refuse to look through the telescope. We can’t protect people from all possible harms.
Thank you for your thought-provoking comment! What do you think?